Legal Opinion
In Re Gaona
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided March 10, 2003No. 19-00383PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN H. HARGROVE, Chief Judge.
Erickson-Hall Construction Company (“Erickson”) and I.E. Pacific, Inc. (“Pacific”), filed objections to debtor’s plan. Debtor challenges the timeliness of Erickson’s and Pacific’s objections because they failed to comply with Local Bankruptcy Rule (“LBR”) 3015-5. Local rule 3015-5 requires creditors who object to a debtor’s chapter 13 plan to obtain a hearing date from the chapter 13 trustee no later than the date the § 341(a) meeting is concluded and then file and serve the objection on the next court day. Erickson and Pacific filed their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Moses Hill, Debtor. Phelix Jones, Creditors v. Moses Hill, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of Ray Bryan ADAMS, Jr., Bankrupt. Z.D. BONNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray Bryan ADAMS, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Bobby Rydell MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daryl F. GATES, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Steinacher v. Rojas (In Re Steinacher)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Loma Linda University Medical Center v. Neese (In Re Neese)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re DornUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2003
- Oakwood Acceptance Corp. v. Dorn (In Re Dorn)District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
- In Re: PerryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021