In Re Souza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
On the fifth day of October, 1923, the petitioner was bound over to the superior court of the county of Sacramento by the police judge of the city of Sacramento to answer the charge of selling liquor in violation of what is generally known and called the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79). The petitioner seeks his discharge herein on the ground that he was held to answer for such alleged offense without probable cause, basing his petition upon subdivision 7 of section 1487 of the Penal Code.
The testimony, as set out in the transcript, shows the following state of facts: During the month of July,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Knight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Elliott v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Vaughn v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bond v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Adrian Gonzalez v. City of Indio, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- United States v. John Michael Chester and Robert Byron WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.