Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. John Michael Chester and Robert Byron Watson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1976No. 75-2457Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTjoflat, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority’s opinion in so far as it affirms the conviction of appellant Watson; however, I cannot agree with the portion of the opinion which holds that the magistrate properly determined that the affidavit established probable cause to search appellant Chester’s residence.1 As I read the affidavit, it is totally inadequate to support a finding of probable cause. In my judgment, the rationale of today’s decision is that the magistrate’s mere suspicion can amount to probable cause. I therefore respectfully dissent.

I

The majority recognizes that to uphold the magistrate’s finding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API