Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Northridge Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 1996No. 95-1193, 95-2035Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSullivan, J.

I wholeheartedly agree with the majority opinion with respect to the issues raised in W. R. Grace & Company's appeal. I also agree with the majority opinion with respect to Northridge Company's cross-appeal on the issues of photocopying costs, double costs, and pre-verdict interest.

I firmly disagree, however, with the majority's reversal of the trial court's reduction of the jury award by Northridge's contributory negligence. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent on that issue.

The majority concludes "the trial court erred in granting Grace's request to reduce the judgment" *291because Grace did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Alaimo v. SchwanzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API