Legal Opinion
Singleterry v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1981No. 13171PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICI, Justice.
Appellees (Singleterrys) own property on which their home is located in the City of Albuquerque. Their deed to the property contains a restrictive covenant requiring them to construct a block wall at least five feet high on their property boundaries with adjoining lots. Singleterrys constructed a wall eight feet high. A City zoning ordinance applicable to this area apparently limits fence or wall heights to eight feet.
Singleterrys built a tennis court in their back yard and then applied for a variance to allow them to build a chainlink fence thirteen feet high along a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Suess v. VogelgesangIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Coe v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Ridge Park Home Owners v. PenaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Downtown Neighborhoods Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dacy v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Kalenka v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Village of Los Ranchos De Albuquerque v. ShiveleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.