Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Haskell's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1938No. Docket No. 19, Calendar No. 39,782Published

1Dissent

The judgment should be affirmed. At the time the will was drawn, testatrix was about 82 years of age. She evidently was wholly inexperienced in business matters, as is shown by her contract with proponent. She agreed to pay him a 50 per cent. contingent fee, in addition to all expenses, for the collection of an account from the Battle Creek College, which in no way disputed the correctness of the account but merely asked for more time in which to pay it because of the financial conditions prevailing in 1932.

The confidential relationship of attorney and client existed between proponent and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Allen's Estate.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Cotcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cooper v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In re Bromley's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fay v. MostMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API