Legal Opinion
United States v. Oswald and Hess Company. United States of America v. Oswald and Hess Company, City of Pittsburgh
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 26, 1965No. 15107_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action to obtain discharge of all claims and liens on property it had bought at a foreclosure sale upon a mortgage which it held. The City of Pittsburgh filed an answer to the petition, claiming a prior lien on the property for certain water and sewage charges owed by Oswald & Hess Company, the mortgagor. The district court granted relief to the City for charges for which bills had been issued up to the time the mortgage in question was recorded. Both the United States and the City have appealed. As we are convinced that our recent decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kimbell Foods, Inc. v. Republic National Bank Of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- The T. H. Rogers Lumber Company v. James Bruce Apel, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- In Re AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lura Virginia Bickel Lee CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.