Legal Opinion

Talcott v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 22, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

The plaintiff is a commission merchant in New York. The defendant is a manufacturer in this State. He had three mills, one of which was run under his own name, one under the name of F. C. Smith and Company, and one under the name of Chappel Mills.

He consigned goods to the plaintiff under an agreement that the plaintiff should make advances, should sell the goods, and, after deducting his advances, with interest, and his expenses, charges, and commissions, should credit the defendant with the net proceeds. The defendant kept the accounts of each mill separate; he consigned and invoiced the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. HartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Vrusho v. VrushoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Hutchins v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API