Legal Opinion
Vrusho v. Vrusho
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The record states that "the following facts were testified to by the plaintiff and admitted by the defendant.” It is unnecessary to recite them in detail. The trial judge was warranted in finding thereon that the defendant had received from the plaintiff $454.07, the amount claimed in the declaration. But the defendant, besides a general denial, had pleaded payment, and the judge expressly found, that "the plaintiff has been paid in full.” The question accordingly is, whether upon the evidence this finding was warranted.
The defendant never paid nor tendered the amount claimed. It is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loanes v. GastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Real Property Co. v. PittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Spevack v. BudishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Thompson v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Breck v. BarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elliott v. Warwick Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Klefbeck v. DousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Silverstein v. SasterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Beacon Oil Co. v. PerelisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Lane v. Volunteer Co-operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.