Legal Opinion

LaTruffe v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1102 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Craig,

In this unemployment compensation case, the restaurant employer, LaTruffe, has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review awarding benefits to the claimant, despite his voluntary termination, on the ground that he had cause to quit because, as the referee and board found,

*324the employer refused to 'Compensate him for working on December 23, I960 which would normally have been 'his day off.

Concomitant findings, based upon testimony of the claimant uncontradicted at the hearing, were that the claimant had previously always been paid for extra…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Emgee Engineering Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Frey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Review Board of the Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Solomon v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Thomas v. REVIEW BD., DEPT. OF EMP. & TRAINING SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Mitchell v. Crookston Welding MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API