Legal Opinion

Koman v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1981No. Appeal, No. 606 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Claimant appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which without taking additional evidence, affirmed a referee’s denial of benefits pursuant to Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.

*606Claimant voluntarily terminated her employment after receiving a paycheck from which money had been deducted because Claimant allegedly exceeded her allotted vacation time. In this appeal Claimant challenges the Board’s determination that she is ineligible for benefits because she quit her job without cause of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ruckstuhl v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Helsel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Pastorius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Gordon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. McQuiston v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spadaro v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Warwick v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Carter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Ryan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API