Gormley v. Lan

This case concerns the appropriate message to be conveyed in an interpretive statement accompanying a proposed State constitutional amendment affecting riparian lands which appeared on the ballot in the November general election. I subscribe generally to this Court’s resolution of the matter. My point of difference with the Court is narrow but important. I believe the Attorney General had every right to make a more explicit *46reference in the interpretive statement to the effect of the amendment upon the public school fund.1

The responsibility for fashioning an interpretive statement belongs to…