Legal Opinion

Niday v. Graef

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1922No. 3764PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of tiie District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, J. Suit in equity by Julia Green Graef against J. E. Niday arid others. Decree for complainant, and both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by Mrs. Julia Graef to set aside two deeds of land made in 1914 and 1915, respectively, by R. E. Green, who died in March, 1917, to J. E. Niday, the husband of Mrs. Niday, a sister of Julia Graef. The essence of the complaint is that Mr. Niday obtained the deeds in an improper manner, and that Mr. Green, who was the father of Mrs. Niday and Mrs. Graef, executed the deeds while under Niday’s influence. Defendants Niday and wife admitted the conveyances, but denied all allegations of improper *942conduct, and alleged that the property had been sold by them…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Harding v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. United States v. MashunkasheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Preno v. Connell Anthracite Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API