Legal Opinion

Borough of Beaver v. Steckman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Patrick J. and Casey L. Steckman (the Steckmans) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County of May 8, 1998 that found them in contempt of the trial court’s order of April 10, 1995, enjoining them from selling grave markers and monuments at their property in the Borough of Beaver (Borough), and required them to pay $9,592.50 to the Borough for attorney’s fees. The Steckmans question whether the trial court erred or abused its discretion in finding them to be in contempt of the April 1995 order when there was no evidence that they acted in willful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Township of South Strabane v. PiecknickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Thompson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Crozer-Chester Medical Center v. MoranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Messmore's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HendrickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline L.P. ~ Appeal of: E.S. GerhartCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API