Prieto v. Home Education Livelihood Program
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Judge.
The sole issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the New Mexico statutes require dismissal of a suit if plaintiff fails to immediately serve the complaint upon issuance of process. We hold that even though service could have been accomplished earlier, our statutes do not require dismissal when delay in service alone is the basis of the motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 8, 1977, the last day before the statute of limitations on his claim would have run. Service was not made on defendant (H.E. L.P.) until almost three months later. During…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- A. L. Murphy v. Citizens Bank of Clovis, A.W. Skarda and Lionel G. SkardaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Baker v. SojkaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Dresden v. District Court of Second Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by14 opinions
- King v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Romero v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Galion v. Conmaco International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Graubard v. Balcor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.