Parker v. Berry
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Alim District Cowl. This case determines questions of practice only; and the facts, and the proceedings in the court below, upon which these questions are raised, are sufficiently stated in the opinion, infra. Mrs. Berry, defendant below, had judgment for costs, at the March Term 1873 of the district court, and the plaintiff brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was' delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The plaintiff in her petition in the court below alleged that she was administratrix of the estate of Arthur D. Parker, deceased, that the defendant was indebted to the deceased for money loaned and advanced, and for services rendered, and asked the court to render judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of said indebtedness. The defendant answered by filing a general denial. The jury rendered a general verdict for the plaintiff for $2,500, and .also made special findings showing that the plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Reaves v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Welser v. United Gas Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Mitchell v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
- Atwood Mercantile Co. v. RooneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.