State v. Joyner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends that the superior court lacked jurisdition to try him for misdemeanor possession of marijuana without amending the original warrant or procuring a new warrant. According to defendant, the record does not reveal that he received a trial on the misdemeanor charge in district court, *363but that the district court, upon finding no probable cause for the felony charge, summarily found him guilty without affording him a trial on the lesser misdemeanor charge. Therefore, defendant asserts, the superior court had no derivative jurisdiction over him.
G.S. 7A-271(a) (5)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . EdneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.