Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 23, 1969No. 697SC44PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The sole assignment of error in the record is that the court erred in pronouncing an excessive, cruel and unreasonable punishment and that the record proper does not support the judgment. Appellant’s brief sets forth no argument and cites no authority in support of the contention that the punishment imposed was excessive. Therefore, that portion of the assignment of error is deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals; State v. Jetton, 1 N.C. App. 567, 162 S.E. 2d 102. In any event it is clear that the sentence imposed was within statutory limits and cannot be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Neller v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. State v. YodprasitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Quate v. CaudleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. ConardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API