Legal Opinion
Raul Gonzales v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00523Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL GONZALES, Case No. 2:25-cv-00523-WLH-JPR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 12 TO REMAND [14] 13 v. 14 FORD MOTOR CO., et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (the “Motion”). (Mot. to 19 Remand (“Mot.”), Docket No. 14). No party filed a written request for oral argument 20 stating that an attorney with five years or less of experience would be arguing the 21 matter. (See Standing Order, Docket No. 7 at 16). Further, pursuant to Federal Rule 22 of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.