Legal Opinion
Van-American Insurance v. Schiappa
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 31, 2000No. C2-99-511PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the defendants’ combined motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for a more definite statement and for summary judgment together with a motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e). (Doc. 5).
I
The Court will first consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss, made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and for summary judgment, made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. While the motions primarily challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiffs Complaint, the defendants correctly note that they have submitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Robert J. Guidry v. Bank of Laplace, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Northland Insurance Company v. Guardsman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- In re Petters Company, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Air Cargo, Inc. Litigation Trust Ex Rel. Fletcher v. I2 Technologies, Inc. (In Re Air Cargo, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Morris v. Zelch (In Re Regional Diagnostics, LLC.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Kranz v. KoenigDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.