Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Kochenberger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 19, 1948No. 15,825Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Milo J. Flanders, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, instituted a derivative action against Austin G. Kochenberger as clerk and recorder of Pueblo county and the Board of County Commissioners of the county to compel Kochenberger to account to the board for fees, perquisites, commissions and emoluments of his office and for judgment for the amount found to be due; for the removal of Kochenberger from office, and other relief. Upon trial to the court, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted, and the action dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

In his amended complaint plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Walters v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. El Paso County v. SheldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  5. Thornton v. PeerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API