Percy v. Hofius
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Respondent obtained a default judgment in conciliation court for the claimed unpaid balance on a contract. Appellant filed a notice of appeal and demand for removal in the county court. Respondent argued appellant did not comply with several of the technical requirements of Minn. Conciliation Ct. R. 1.21. Appellant attempted but was unable to serve respondent with the notice within the 10 day period prescribed by rule 1.21 and did not file an affidavit of attempted service. Likewise, appellant did not file an affidavit that removal was made in good…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mattsen v. PackmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Taylor v. SteinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Hammer v. SoderbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- McClellan v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997