Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. De Hart

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 24, 1941No. 7779PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

The question presented on this appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, in favor of respondent DeHart, is whether he is entitled to a refund of income tax paid to the District of Columbia for the year ending December 31, 1939, in the amount of $16.36. The pertinent language of the applicable statute reads as follows i1

“Tax on Individuals. — There is hereby levied for each taxable year upon the taxable income of every individual domiciled in the District of Columbia on the last day of the taxable year a tax at the following rates: * * * [Italics supplied]”

In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweeney v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Pace v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Beedy v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Alexander v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. District of Columbia v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API