Legal Opinion
In re Canon Cameras Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 2006No. 05 Civ. 7233(JSR)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases (and proposed class action) are purchasers of various models of digital cameras manufactured by defendant. Plaintiffs allege, in essence, that these cameras suffer from various technological and physical defects and that the defendant, despite having knowledge of these defects, failed to inform the public of their existence. Specifically, in their Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Second Amended Complaint”), plaintiffs highlight Canon’s Digital Imaging Integrated Circuit processor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Chin v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- O'NEIL v. Simplicity, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Daigle v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.