Legal Opinion

United States v. Brosseau

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 11, 2006No. 3:04-cv-02376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KINKEADE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Elaine M. Wiant’s (“Wiant”) Motion to Intervene, in her capacity as court-appointed receiver in cause number 03-03257-J, in the 191st District Court of Dallas County, Texas. Wiant’s motion was filed for the sole purpose of distributing funds in accordance with this Court’s Order. Wiant’s motion is therefore GRANTED. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.

Also before the Court is Charles McGar-ry’s (“McGarry”) Motion to Intervene. McGarry filed an answer to Plaintiff United States of America’s (“the Government”) Application for Writ of Garnishment as an intervenor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Dow Chemical Company v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Read v. United States Ex Rel. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BetancourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. CaramadreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API