Legal Opinion
Breidbart v. Wiesenthal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 30, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to compel partnership accountings and a distribution of partnership assets, the plaintiffs appeal (1) , by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 28, 2006, which, in effect, confirmed the report of a Judicial Hearing Officer (Lodato, J.H.O.), dated June 12, 2006, made after a hearing, inter alia, accepting the defendants’ accounting and rejecting the plaintiffs’ claim for a surcharge against the defendants, and (2) from an order of the same court dated October 25, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jeffreys v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stone v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cvetichanin v. Trapezoid Land Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taub v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Breidbart v. WiesenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Breidbart v. WiesenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Stewart v. MoseleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Stewart v. MoseleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013