Legal Opinion
Breidbart v. Wiesenthal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to compel partnership accountings and a distribution of partnership assets, the defendants Samuel Goldstein, Marilyn Zuckerman, Barbara Claman, Brooklawn Associates, Sherman Associates, Britegold Realty Co., Inc., Hanruth Realty Corp., Franclen Realty Co., Inc., Marbob Realty Corp., Britegold Associates, Hanruth Associates, Franclen Associates, Marbob Associates, and Albob Associates appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 15, 2010, as denied that branch of their motion which was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wiener v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Tutrani v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Trager v. KampeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Estate of FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cunha v. UriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cunha v. UriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013