Legal Opinion

Howard County v. Bullis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Howard Circuit Court. These are actions in chancery to quiet the title of the respective plaintiffs to two different tracts of land, severally involved in each action. Plaintiff’s petition was dismissed in the first action; the relief sought in the second was granted. The county appeals in each case.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. These causes were submitted and argued together. While each involves a separate tract of land, they are submitted upon the same evidence. The same principle of law is involved in each case. The first action is brought to quiet the title of the county, and to set aside a tax title; the second to establish and quiet plaintiff’s tax title. The sufficiency of the tax title to divest the county’s interest in the separate tracts of land is presented for determination hi each case. The property involved in each action is a part of the swamp lands granted to the county. It is shown that each tract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. GormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Adams County v. B. & M. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Iowa Railroad Land v. Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Audubon Co. v. American Emigrant Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. County of Buena Vista v. Iowa Falls & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BallNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hays v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Hart v. DelpheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API