Legal Opinion

Progressive Life Insurance v. Doster

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1958No. 37433PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

Special demurrers 1, 2 and 3 to count 1 attack as conclusions the allegations that the acts of each of the, individual defendants were “within the scope of his employment with said defendant corporation and in prosecution of the business of said corporation.” Such an allegation is not subject to demurrer. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Gory., 81 Ga. App. 324 (3) (58 S. E. 2d 559).

The allegation in paragraph 12 of count 1 that “petitioner was discharged for the reason of making a vacancy for the nephew of said defendant Roberts, and after the discharge of petitioner said nephew…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Auld v. Colonial Stores Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Floyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Young v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Simmons v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Gaddy v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Wilborn v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API