Legal Opinion

Maffet v. Quine

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Petition ior Rehearing. For former opinion, see 93 Fed. 347.

1Opinion of the Court

BELLINGER, District Judge.

In this suit the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from tearing down and destroying a certain flume, constructed and in operation prior to the commission by the defendant of the acts complained of, across the premises of the defendant, and used in connection with certain water rights and with the (tarrying on of the lumber business owned and carried on by the plaintiff and her lessees. The case was heard upon all questions involved, and thereafter the court dismissed the complaint for want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that it did not appear from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Bank of Arapahoe v. David Bradley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. United States v. TaylorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1890
  5. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Le Quime v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McPhillameyWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Risty v. Chicago, R. I. &. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Rasmussen v. BlustNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API