Legal Opinion

Richmeade, L.P. v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 23, 2004No. Record 031513PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this appeal we consider whether this action for inverse condemnation is subject to the three-year statute of limitations for an implied contract, Code § 8.01-246, or the five-year limitations period for injury to property, Code § 8.01-243.

Richmeade, L.R, owns approximately 25 acres of land in the City of Richmond, known as the Windsor Apartment Complex. On February 17, 1997, Richmeade acquired an option to purchase real property located next to the Windsor Apartment Complex. In order to develop the two parcels as a single apartment development, Richmeade requested that the City vacate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pigott v. MoranSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Hampton Roads Sanitation District v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Burns v. Board of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Birmingham v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Friedman v. Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Kitchen v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Klumpp v. Borough of AvalonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  5. Lee v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API