City of Joplin v. Wallace Bajjali Development Partners, L.P.

Wallace Bajjali Development Partners, L.P. (“Wallace Bajjali”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its Rule 74.05(d) motion to set aside a default judgment.1 Wal*329lace Bajjali argues the trial court erred in denying its motion to set aside the default judgment. Although framed as one point, Wallace Bajjali’s argument has two prongs. First, Wallace Bajjali claims the trial court did not apply the correct legal standard because it did not mention Rule 74.05(d) in its judgment. Second, Wallace Bajjali argues the trial court did not apply the correct legal standard. because “the evidence…