Legal Opinion

Strong v. Pyrke

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Upon an application for certiorari to review an award of compensation by the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, this court increased the amount of such award to $7,000. {Matter of Strong v. Pyrke, 135 Misc. 589.) A motion is now urged by the Attorney-General to vacate the order on the ground that the original *524application to review should have been made returnable at the Appellate Division of the Third Department since the Special Term was without jurisdiction. In support of this contention People ex rel. Dawley v. Wilson (200 App. Div. 537) is cited. There, the claim was made under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Dawley v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Strong v. PyrkeNew York Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API