Legal Opinion
Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc. v. Maltbie
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChurch, J.
This is a proceeding for an order (in the nature of prohibition) pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit the respondents, members of the Public Service Commission of the State of New York, from taking any proceeding in connection with altering or changing the rate of fare charged by petitioner, Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc., for the transportation of passengers in the borough of Queens, city and State of New York.
The petitioner applied for and received a certificate of public convenience and necessity (Public Service Law, § 63-d) from the Transit Commission which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Derby v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People Ex Rel. N.Y.C. H.R.R. Co. v. . PriestNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Dairy Sealed, Inc. v. Ten EyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Schuyler v. State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Avon Dairies, Inc. v. Du MondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.