Bowman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Vaughan, J. P.
Defendant appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Special Term, denying its motion under rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings. The sole question is whether the amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The amended complaint alleges that the defendant, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, sold for immediate human consumption a bottle of “ Wesson ” oil containing a decayed mouse, and that plaintiff suffered certain injuries when she ate a salad containing some of the oil. It is alleged that plaintiff “ resided…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Chysky v. . Drake Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kelly Asphalt Block Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Redmond v. Borden's Farm Products Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Welch v. SchiebelhuthNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Parish v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Greenberg v. LorenzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
- Shoopak v. United States Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.