Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dibbell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 19, 1998No. 97-2181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHoover, J.

Marlene and Kurt Brown appeal a judgment finding Marlene Brown contributorily negligent in an informed consent suit she brought against Dr. David Dibbell and.Dr. Steven Johnson. The Browns contend that a patient cannot be contributorily negligent for purposes of informed consent for failing to make sufficient inquiries or by opting to undergo a viable treatment option the doctor recommends. We conclude the evidence does not sustain the jury's verdict that Brown was contributorily negligent. Dibbell cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Bryan v. James Holmes Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. DibbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API