Legal Opinion

Camus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2006No. 05CA1404PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge J. JONES.

In this insurance bad faith case, plaintiffs, Macario Camus and Kristen Camus, appeal the summary judgment for defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, on the basis of claim preclusion. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. Facts

The summary judgment record is sparse, consisting primarily of briefs in which the parties argue various inferences from and legal conclusions based on allegations of the complaint, but without presenting evidence as to the underlying facts. In granting summary judgment, the trial court took judicial notice of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Porn v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Cruz v. BenineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coomer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Western Innovations, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Grynberg v. Total Compagnie Francaise des PetrolesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API