Legal Opinion
The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company v. Estate of Jefffrey Rolison
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00762Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE PROCTER & GAMBLE U.S. : BUSINESS SERVICES COMPANY, : as Plan Administrator and on Behalf: of THE PROCTER & GAMBLE PROFIT : SHARING TRUST AND EMPLOYEE : STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and THE — : PROCTER & GAMBLE SAVINGS : PLAN : Plaintiff, : V. : 3:17-CV-762 : (JUDGE MARIANI) ESTATE OF JEFFREY ROLISON, : Deceased, MARGARET M. : LOSINGER, and MARY LOU MURRAY : Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION |. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Estate of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.