Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Williams and Henry Watson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 12, 1964No. 429, Docket 28741PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Convicted of unlawfully possessing narcotics, appellants Robert Williams and Henry Watson contend on appeal that Judge Croake improperly denied their pre-trial motions to suppress heroin seized in the course of an allegedly illegal search. We entirely agree with Judge Croake’s determination, reported at 219 F.Supp. 666 (S.D.N.Y.1963), that the search was incident to a lawful arrest, and we accordingly affirm the convictions.

As the relevant facts are fully and fairly set forth in Judge Croake’s opinion, they will not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that 26 U.S.C. § 7607 empowers a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Wai LauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. James Ernest ManningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Richard E. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Edward Lee TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Max Manny Elgisser and Louis GladsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API