Cruz v. Visual Perceptions, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
1DissentLavine, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I conclude that the March 1, 2007 agreement (2007 agreement) signed by the plaintiff, Norma I. Cruz, and the defendant Robert W. Aube, Jr., is a compensation agreement, not a contract guaranteeing three years of employment with the defendant Visual Perceptions, LLC. Neither the plaintiff, nor Aube believed the agreement guaranteed three years of employment when the agreement was entered into. For this reason, and others, I would reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The issue in this case turns, in part, on the meaning of the first…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Frantz v. RomaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006