Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Gladstone

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIkving H. Saypol, J.

In 1954 Kadel, a lawyer, Gladstone, Ms legally trained client and business friend or acquaintance, and Goddard were involved with others in the consummation of a business venture leading to the issuance of Standard Industries, Inc. stock. For his compensation in advancing the deal Gladstone would get 25,000 shares of the new stock, qualified against transference. Gladstone and Kadel had been in many business, professional and personal relationships and there had been money advances on both sides. At the same time Kadel held Gladstone’s promissory demand note, dated January 12, 1949, for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Acts of the Property of KimberlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Spencer v. Standard Chemicals & Metals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Sanford v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Smith v. . BeattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander A. Simon, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Michael W. Swofford, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Goddard v. GladstoneNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API