Smith v. . Beattie

The plaintiff prosecuted this action as receiver, appointed in proceedings supplementary to the execution upon a judgment rendered in the Court of Common Pleas of the city of Mew York, wherein the Baldwin Company were plaintiffs, and one Arthur Donally defendant. After stating the recovery of the judgment, the supplementary proceeding and his appointment as receiver, the plaintiff in his .complaint proceeds to allege, that after contracting the debt upon which the judgment was recovered, and on the 10th day of May, 1859, Donally, the judgment debtor being insolvent, and with intent to delay…