Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dawson v. a & H MFG. CO.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 5, 1983No. 81-1-AppealPublished

1Dissent

BEYILACQUA, Chief Justice with whom KELLEHER, Justice, joins,

dissenting.

The facts briefly summarized are not in dispute. The employee was employed as a stock boy. Before lunch time, he left his workplace to get a cup of coffee, which break was authorized. While later returning to eat his lunch, he was stung by a bee. The majority sustained the commission’s holding that there was no evidence establishing a causal connection between the employment and the injury.

The sole question presented is whether the employer is in a better position to bear the loss in a case in which an employee is injured…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Gargiulo v. GargiuloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Beauchesne v. David London & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Baran's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API