Dawson v. a & H MFG. CO.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Dissent
BEYILACQUA, Chief Justice with whom KELLEHER, Justice, joins,
dissenting.
The facts briefly summarized are not in dispute. The employee was employed as a stock boy. Before lunch time, he left his workplace to get a cup of coffee, which break was authorized. While later returning to eat his lunch, he was stung by a bee. The majority sustained the commission’s holding that there was no evidence establishing a causal connection between the employment and the injury.
The sole question presented is whether the employer is in a better position to bear the loss in a case in which an employee is injured…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Gargiulo v. GargiuloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Beauchesne v. David London & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Baran's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.