Legal Opinion
Crump v. Kansas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 2001No. CIV.A.97-3018-CMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22). Because the court finds that (1) plaintiff has no liberty interest in parole pursuant to Kansas law, (2) the classifications applied by the state to the plaintiff are rationally related to a governmental interest and therefore do not constitute a violation of plaintiffs equal protection right pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, and (3) Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3717 (Supp.2000) does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution, the court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henderson v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Knapp v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002