Moore v. Carr
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Petitioner seeks by this mandamus proceeding' (Ex parte Holzer, 219 Ala. 431, 122 So. 421) to vacate the order of the circuit judge transferring his case against the Sinclair Refining Company from the law to the equity side of the docket. The suit at law sought to recover damages for breach of contract and for negligent installation of gasoline equipment. The petition for removal to the equity docket was based upon the averments therein contained disclosing damages suffered by the defendant in the law action as the result of a trespass quare clausum fregit, and also trespass de bonis…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosser v. Bunn & TimberlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Tate v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Chambers v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Ex Parte HolzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Norton v. BumpusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Superior Construction Co. v. ElmoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Orkin Exterminating Co. of So. Fla., Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Cortner v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Dekle v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.