Legal Opinion

Tate v. Evans

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Butler. Heard before Hon. H. Austill, Tbe case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Tbe bill in tbe present case avers tbat tbe complainant and defendant formed a partnership to carry on tbe mill business in the State of Florida; that such partnership was formed in 1871, and continued until 1874, when it was dissolved; and that at the dissolution, and at the time the bill was filed, Tate, tbe appellant, was indebted to Evans, the complainant below, in the sum of forty-five hundred dollars — on partnership account — a sum greater than that, the collection of which the present bill seeks to enjoin. Tbe debt from Evans to Tate, the bill alleges, is a note of neaf twenty-nine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donelson's Adm'rs v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  2. White v. WigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. Wray's Adm'rs v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. Stubbs v. LeavittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Lockard v. LockardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bolling v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Glover v. HembreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Farris v. HoustonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Houston v. MadduxIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API