Legal Opinion

Junget v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1913No. Gen. No. 17,871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from? the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Cavebly, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been received by Valberg Jun-get, appellee, while she was a passenger on one of the cars belonging to the appellant. The jury awarded her $3,000, and judgment was entered on the verdict. We are asked to reverse this judgment on the ground that the amount is excessive, and for errors hereinafter referred to.

It is argued that the evidence proves that appellee was not seriously injured, and that from the nature of the accident she could not have received the injuries of which she complains. There was testimony tending to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greinke v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. GieseIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Lauth v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Shaughnessy v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cole v. City of East St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weber v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API