Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Heird

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 2015No. CV-15-11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRita W. Gruber, Judge

11 This is a second appeal regarding the amount of the attorney’s fee that William L. Bateman was' awarded on his small-claims judgment for property damage in a motor-vehicle accident. See Bateman v. Heird, 2013 Ark. App. 671, 2013 WL 6002057 (Bateman I) (remanding for consideration of the factors of Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc., 304 Ark. 227, 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990)). Mr. Bateman brings'the present appeal from the order that the trial court entered on remand. He contends, as he did in the first appeal, that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding only $750 as his attorney’s fee.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Bateman v. HeirdCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephen W. Boatright, Individually and on Behalf of Stephen W. Boatright, Dds, P.A. v. S-R Plaza, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API