Legal Opinion

Nahas v. Nahas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1954No. Appeals, 1 and 170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Boss, J.,

On October 14, 1952, plaintiffs, David and- Mary Nahas, entered judgment in ejectment against defendant, Albert Nahas, under authority of a warrant of attorney in a written lease of premises owned by plaintiffs in Borough Township, Beaver County. Defendant filed a petition to open the judgment and obtained a rule on plaintiffs to show cause why judgment should not be opened, but by agreement of the parties this rule was not pursued. Counsel for the respective parties entered into a stipulation whereby it was agreed “that the action shall be tried as if the Court had entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Augustine v. AugustineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  4. Cake v. CakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Steinman v. Lacharty Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re C & C Tv & Appliance, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API