West v. Brevard Tanning Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Justice, J., at March Term, 1910, of BUNCOMBE. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the Court
"WalkeR, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit, which motion was refused, and the only question for our consideration is, Was the evidence sufficient to be submitted to the jury, who found by their verdict that there was negligence which was the proximate cause of the injury, and that the intestate did not, by his own negligence, contribute to the injury which caused his death. In passing upon the single exception, we are restricted to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Harley v. Buffalo Car Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Cotton v. North Carolina R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Dorsett v. Clement-Ross Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Cochran v. Young-Hartsell Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Taylor v. Neuse Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Patterson v. . NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.